In developing a theory of short run economic fluctuation, Keynes proposed the theory of liquidity preference to explain the determinants of the interest. According to this theory, the interest rate adjusts to balance the supply and demand for money.
An increase in the price level raises money demand and increases the interest rate that bring the market into equilibrium. Since the interest rate represents the costs of borrowing, a higher interest rate reduces investment and quantity of goods and services demanded.
Policymakers can influence aggregate demand with monetary policy, as an increase nion the money supply reduces the equilibrium interest rate for any given price. Since a lower interest rate stimulates investment spending, the aggregate demand curve shifts to the right. Fiscal policy could also be utilized to influence aggregate demand. Increases in government purchases of cuts in taxes shifts the demand curve to the right, whereas a decrease in government purchases or increase in taxes shifts the aggregate demand curve to the left.
When the government alters spending or taxes, the resulting shift in demand can be larger or smaller than the fiscal change, and the multiplier effect tends to amplify the effects of fiscal policy on aggregate demand. But, the bow dining out effect tends to dampen the effects of fiscal policy on aggregate demand.
Since monetary and fiscal policy can influence aggregate demand, the government sometimes uses these policy instruments in an attempt to stabilize the economy. Economists disagree about how active the government should be in this. According to advocates of active stabilization policy, changes in attitudes byu households and firms shift aggregate demand, but if the government does not respond, the result is undesirable and unnecessary fluctuations in output employment. According to critics of active stabilization policy, monetary and fiscal policy work with such long lags that attempts at stabilizing the economy often end up destabilizing it.